Jeff Lebowski is ... the Dude. Vestibulum id ligula porta felis euismod semper. Maecenas sed diam eget risus varius blandit sit amet non magna. Curabitur blandit tempus porttitor.

More >

Powered by Squarespace
  • The Big Lebowski (Limited Edition) [Blu-ray Book + Digital Copy]
    The Big Lebowski (Limited Edition) [Blu-ray Book + Digital Copy]
    starring Jeff Bridges, John Goodman
  • The Big Lebowski (Widescreen Collector's Edition)
    The Big Lebowski (Widescreen Collector's Edition)
    starring Jeff Bridges, John Goodman, Julianne Moore, Steve Buscemi, David Huddleston
  • The Big Lebowski - 10th Anniversary Limited Edition
    The Big Lebowski - 10th Anniversary Limited Edition
    starring Jeff Bridges, John Goodman, Julianne Moore, Steve Buscemi, David Huddleston
« The Promise and Peril of Ubiquitous Community | Main | What's the Future Like for a "Renaissance Man" in a Connected World? »
Sunday
May112008

Friendfeed's Business Model Will Look Like Google's

I love Friendfeed. However, I am far more enthusiastic about the platform's robust RSS and search capabilities than its current value proposition as a universal social aggregator. I find it generates too much noise at times, but when you tap its search/RSS tools you have a killer app.

As I recently noted Friendfeed's imaginary friend feature is incredibly powerful. In addition, so are its advanced search capabilities. Combine them and this is where things get interesting.

Here's an example. I haven't tried this yet. But my gut is that you can actually use Friendfeed to create a Google Coop-like scoped search tool just for Twitter.

Simply take the Twitter public timeline feed and add it as an imaginary friend. Now you can scan the full text of every tweet - even if Summize should go belly up one day. In addition, you can generate RSS feeds against this new imaginary friend for any term you want to track. The public timeline too much for you? No problem. Just take your personalized Twitter friendstream feed and now you can data mine just your peeps.

This is just the beginning. Friendfeed benefits immensely from the network effect. The more individuals that aggregate their social streams with the service, the more it can be data mined and thus monetized - and its power grows.

So, for argument's sake, let's say in a year that even 50% of people who actively publish online aggregate their streams with Friendfeed. Suddenly you have a competitor that in utility could eclipse most of the vertical social search engines like Technorati, Google Blog Search and Summize. Friendfeed doesn't index the full text of blog feeds yet but I suspect one day they will give publishers the ability to opt-in.

Now, what if Friendfeed were to wrap Google Adsense contextual ads around keyword searches just as it becomes the de-facto source for searching the social web. Think that's big? I do. And that fact that Friendfeed's founders come from Google probably bodes well for such a model. Stay tuned.

Reader Comments (9)

Brilliant idea, Steve. I just set up my imaginary friend as recommended and it works REALLY well. Thanks for the mega-tip for leveraging friend-feed's potential. It's my vote for killer app 2008.
May 11, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterLori Laurent Smith
You make great points about FriendFeed and I agree with you. Friendfeed has much better revenue opportunities than Twitter does.

The Google comparisons are not random as Friendfeed's founders came over from Google. I don't think all that whitespace to the right of the "friendstream" is an accident either... It's not "what if?", it's "when".



May 11, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterRobert Seidman
If you only envision FriendFeed as a tool for Twitter you don't get it.

FriendFeed makes Twitter obsolete.
May 11, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterTranceMist
Please can you explain to me one think I seem to not understand - why should I subscribe to tweets in FF to be able to search them later inside FF, when I can search them directly with summize?

What is the exact benefit of being subscribed to them, when the data are public anyway?

Thank you.
May 12, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterquirkyalone
Totally agree, Steve. Glad you're using FF more. Terribly exciting to me esp. since FF is visual, simple & has a killer name. These aspects just *might* convert average web user into better understanding what a "feed" does and how their "friends" will show them the way. I am passionate about that average web user.

p.s. And yes, TranceMist, FF may truly make Twitter obsolete by moving the conversation to FF esp. since Twitter can be unstable. But, because of Twitter's market pull right now and it's simplicity, I would not announce it's demise... yet.
May 12, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterBarbaraKB
Totally agree, Steve. Glad you're using FF more. Terribly exciting to me esp. since FF is visual, simple & has a killer name. These aspects just *might* convert average web user into better understanding what a "feed" does and how their "friends" will show them the way. I am passionate about that average web user.

p.s. And yes, TranceMist, FF may truly make Twitter obsolete by moving the conversation to FF esp. since Twitter can be unstable. But, because of Twitter's market pull right now and it's simplicity, I would not announce it's demise... yet.
May 12, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterBarbaraKB
I always enjoy your post! Very insightful and useful. I'm heading over to Friendfeed right now to learn more.
May 12, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDr. Mac
I think FF has a little ways to go yet, but is coming along nicely. I do not mean to be picky, but I think they are also a good recourse, that with time will develope into something even better.
May 12, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterHomejobsite
thank you
May 13, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterravinder

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>