Jeff Lebowski is ... the Dude. Vestibulum id ligula porta felis euismod semper. Maecenas sed diam eget risus varius blandit sit amet non magna. Curabitur blandit tempus porttitor.

More >

Powered by Squarespace
  • The Big Lebowski (Limited Edition) [Blu-ray Book + Digital Copy]
    The Big Lebowski (Limited Edition) [Blu-ray Book + Digital Copy]
    starring Jeff Bridges, John Goodman
  • The Big Lebowski (Widescreen Collector's Edition)
    The Big Lebowski (Widescreen Collector's Edition)
    starring Jeff Bridges, John Goodman, Julianne Moore, Steve Buscemi, David Huddleston
  • The Big Lebowski - 10th Anniversary Limited Edition
    The Big Lebowski - 10th Anniversary Limited Edition
    starring Jeff Bridges, John Goodman, Julianne Moore, Steve Buscemi, David Huddleston
« How to Share Items in Google Reader and Still Keep Them Private | Main | links for 2007-12-22 »
Tuesday
Dec252007

Charting 2007's Three Big Web 2.0 Trends

"The best thing about the future is that it only comes one day at a time." - Abraham Lincoln

Thinking about the future is fun. It's what I am paid to do. However, I never contemplate the days ahead without the context of the past. After all, the future is always grounded in history. That's why I have become a heavy user of Google Trends.

The tool is closest thing we have to a global rear-view mirror. Blog search and conversation charts only go so far. They capture what a small subset of the most vocal, tech-savvy users are saying. Search engines, on the other hand, show us what's on everyone's mind - including the giant underwater iceberg of silent users.

Like 2006, this was a big year for Web 2.0. Here are Google Trends charts I pulled looking at three broad 2007 Web 2.0 trends, along with my comments. I chose to focus here on broad trends, as opposed to the gyrations of individual sites, which always change with fickle users. (Micro blogging is an exception because the term is rarely used so I looked at Twitter instead.)

All of the data is global in scope and only as current as mid-December. Of course, all of this is just directional. Ideally, it would be great to cross-reference all of this with other sources, like Compete.com. Still, they do provide perspective.

Trend I: Social Networking

* Data: Searches for social networking and news volume both doubled in 2007. However, more recently, the volume has started to show some signs of weakness. Meanwhile, geographically, interest in social networking from India and Singapore is skyrocketing. Search volume for individual sites, like Facebook, appear to track the broader meme.

* Insight: Social networking is evolving from a group of sites into several competing platforms that power thousands of sites. Eventually, we won't think of social networks as sites but as a feature. This data might just be the first sign of such a progression.

Trend II: Micro Blogging

* Data: Micro blogging doesn't register on Google Trends, so I chose to compare Twitter and blogging (as opposed to "blogs" which is a much broader term). What's fascinating here is that searches for Twitter surpassed for "blogging" in April and never looked back. Meanwhile, news volume for the two are neck and neck. Twitter is particularly strong in Japan. That said, interest in micro blogging has dropped off dramatically this (nearly 50% off their peak in the spring).

* Insight: Blogging is work and the payoff (emotional or monetary) can be hard to come by, particularly for those of us who want to see a rapid return on our investment in time. Meanwhile, personal publishing is evolving because of the increasing sophistication of mobile devices and the Attention Crash. Micro blogging fosters connection with less work all while working well with mobile devices. Blogging remains important, however, as the traditional press rapidly embraced blogging, it has encouraged individual publishers to find new ways to spread their influence.

Trend III:: Web Applications

* Data: Google searches for web apps doubled in the second half of the year. That said they are dwarfed by stalwarts like Microsoft Office or Apple's iWork suite. Interest in Google Docs has flattened since they rolled out their presentation application. The US leads the way in web based applications.

* Insight: The search data seems to reflect what others have said - that web applications are not on most people's radar. This data is consistent with what Microsoft and Apple have said - people like their desktop apps. Web applications are in their infancy. It should be interesting to see if they will remain a niche category in the years ahead. The lack of the ubiquitous connectivity could be a major stumbling block.

Reader Comments (6)

Are you sure you can draw conclusions like this? I would search for Twitter or for GTD but never for 'web applications'. That is not the sort of word you look for. The answers to the question 'web applications' are not going to solve a problem. Finding an answer to 'mindmapping' or 'projectmanagement' will lead me to web applications but not the other way around. I like watching trends, but be careful with the conclusions!
December 25, 2007 | Unregistered Commentererwin blom
It's interesting to me that, at least so far, Google Trends statistics are taken as gospel, whereas Alexa and Compete.com data is taken with a grain of salt. What would it take for Google to not be trusted?
December 25, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterLouis Gray
Nice post. I have to agree with Erwin's comment and interestingly, this is a perfect example of research concerning key phrases that may really not be the relevant key phrases,
December 25, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterSmall Business Marketing
I have a feeling web applications will really take-off in 2009. 2008 will still be momentum building.
December 26, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterSHAMA HYDER
@Louis

I hope you're viewing Google Trends through the same lens I am; skeptical... maybe even cynical? The search terms that are relevant to the field of advertising in which I work almost never register on Trends (i.e., the same problem Mr. Rubel had with the phrase 'micro blogging'). This strikes me as quite odd, because our clients are spending a lot of money on Google's PPC, meaning, there's obviously traffic. Thus one of my main frustrations with Google: the lack of transparency. I don't need a spreadsheet of every search executed from the last quarter, but at least giving me some idea on phrases which I know are being used. Which, in relation to your point, makes me think that maybe Alexa and Compete aren't that far off...
December 26, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterAdrian Palacios
This can be a flock in no time
December 28, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterjoaquin

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>